But not as an actor, probably as an assistant director
(CBS/AP) LOS ANGELES – After eight “Harry Potter” films (the last of which, “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2,” opens today), it’s hard to imagine anyone besides Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint and Tom Felton playing Harry Potter, Hermione Granger, Ron Weasley and Draco Malfoy. But what if “Potter” hadn’t come calling? In some fantasy world, Radcliffe might be a low-level go-fer on movie sets. Watson could be a nobody auditioning for stage plays. Tom Felton might be noodling around as a musician. And Rupert Grint might be selling ice cream on the street. With one of Hollywood’s biggest film franchises now behind them, the young stars pondered what they might be doing if the acting thing hadn’t worked out. Review: “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2″Pictures: The New York premiereSpecial section: “Harry Potter” through the years Radcliffe: An 11-year-old when picked for the title role of the “Harry Potter” franchise, Radcliffe figures that since his parents worked in the arts – his mother as a casting director, his father as a literary agent – he would have ended up in show business. But not as an actor, probably as an assistant director. “What probably would have happened, when I got to about 17, 18, and it became apparent, as it would have done, to my parents that I wasn’t going to be going...
Read More
Comentarios recientes